Eurovision could be coming to the UK in 2023 after the song contest’s organisers concluded Ukraine is not capable of hosting it, a decision that has angered the Ukrainian government.
Ukraine won this year with Kalush Orchestra’s Stefania, as viewers across the continent came together to vote for the song and show solidarity with the nation after Russian’s invasion.
Tradition dictates that the winner is offered the chance to host the next year’s contest. But the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organises the competition, said it had “with deep regret” concluded that it would not be possible to provide the security and operational guarantees required to hold the contest in Ukraine.
It has asked the BBC to host next year’s competition, after the UK finished in second place with Sam Ryder’s Space Man.
Sources with knowledge of the discussions suggested it is far from a done deal that the UK will end up hosting and suggested Brussels could be preparing a rival bid.
The Ukrainian government is said to be deeply unhappy with the conclusion that it cannot safely host the event, which would mean missing out on a major opportunity to focus the world’s attention on the country and what it has endured.
Only this week, the Ukrainian culture minister, Oleksandr Tkachenko, announced that he had sent a series of potential venues in Ukraine to Eurovision’s organisers. He said he had worked with the country’s security services and the prime minister to provide a plan for hosting and was “sure” Eurovision would take place in Ukraine.
He said: “We understand that in the current circumstances both we and the EBU face a challenge of organising Eurovision in Ukraine. But we have accepted this challenge and, I am sure, we will surprise everyone.”
There is also a suggestion that the EU is working on a rival bid to move next year’s contest to Brussels, where it would be hosted on behalf of Ukraine in a symbolic gesture of solidarity from the “capital of the EU”.
A Downing Street spokesperson said they still hoped Ukraine would host the contest but that if it was held in the UK they would make sure it reflected “Ukraine’s rich culture, heritage and creativity, as well as building on the ongoing partnership between our two countries”.
The EBU said: “The Eurovision song contest is one of the most complex TV productions in the world, with thousands working on, and attending, the event and 12 months of preparation time needed.”
It said, after a lengthy investigation, the required guarantees could not be provided by Ukraine’s public broadcaster and expressed “sadness and disappointment” that next year’s contest could not be held in Ukraine.
“As a result of this decision, in accordance with the rules and to ensure the continuity of the event, the EBU will now begin discussions with the BBC, as this year’s runner-up, to potentially host the 2023 Eurovision song contest in the United Kingdom.
“It is our full intention that Ukraine’s win will be reflected in next year’s shows. This will be a priority for us in our discussions with the eventual hosts.”
The competition was last held in Britain in 1998 after the UK won with Katrina and the Waves’ Love Shine a Light. Hosting Eurovision is a logistical and financial challenge and could be a test for the BBC, which is already struggling with substantial financial cuts and redundancies.
A BBC spokesperson confirmed that the broadcaster was in talks about hosting the event: “We have seen the announcement from the EBU. Clearly these aren’t a set of circumstances that anyone would want. After their decision, we will of course discuss the BBC hosting the Eurovision song contest.”
If the BBC agrees to host the contest, cities across the UK are likely to be keen to stage it. Glasgow’s 14,000-capacity OVO Hydro Arena has been speculated about as a potential venue in recent days based on its potential availability. Manchester, London and Leeds also expressed interest on Friday.
However, the BBC has still yet to even agree to host the contest, with sources emphasising it is too early to start speculating on potential venues.
Estimates on the expense of hosting the competition vary, although the BBC is likely to need to put together a substantial funding package with government support.
This year’s contest in Turin required millions of euros in funding from the city’s local government, in addition to cash from the Italian state. However, the competition attracts tens of thousands of tourists to the host city, which provides a major boost to the local economy.
The last time the winning Eurovision country did not host the following year’s contest was 1980, when Israel’s national broadcaster turned down the chance to take part on cost grounds.
- ‘We weren’t prepared for this’: Kyiv area morgues at breaking point | international News
- Dozens arrested as Insulate Britain halts traffic on M1 and M4 | international News
- Russia-Ukraine war: what we know on day 59 of the invasion | international News
( Information from theguardian.com was used in this report. To Read More, click here )